If you are interested in bringing maps with the Green Line to your synagogue, JCC or other institution please e-mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org and include the name of the institution you would like to reach out to and a phone number where we can reach you.
What story have we been telling with our maps? Have we been forming a picture of Israel as it really is, or perpetuating an illusion?
Maps tell an important story about how we see the world. For many American Jews, our understanding of Israel is shaped by the maps we see on the walls of our Hebrew school classrooms and Jewish community centers. Learn more »
In one page… what is the Green Line and why does it matter to Israel? Here are some key questions, answers and additional references.
Find out how the Green Line affects peace and what blurring the Green Line means to the future of Israel’s democracy. Learn the facts and find out why Israelis and Americans have a responsibility to remember the Green Line. Learn more »
Guide the discussion: what is the Green Line, and what are the arguments for and against it appearing on our maps?
This curriculum helps facilitators guide a thoughtful conversation through the history and nuances of Israel’s borders. See detailed maps and discuss the implications of the Green Line’s visibility. Learn more »
This educators’ text study explores Israel’s boundaries through various texts and sources from Jewish thought.
Explore three sections, with guided discussion points on key themes and ideas using sources that span the range of Jewish literature, from the Torah to modern Hebrew literature. Learn more »
Said to be named for the green marker with which it was drawn, the Green Line was the armistice line of the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, and marked Israel’s borders (78% of Mandate Palestine) for the first 18 years of its existence. In 1967, it became the line separating Israel from the territory it captured in the Six Day War–the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, the Gaza Strip from Egypt, and the Golan Heights from Syria.
These territories are viewed by the US and the international community as being under “military occupation,” though their status is more complicated within Israel. The Israeli government officially annexed East Jerusalem in 1967 and the Golan Heights in 1980, and withdrew its civilian population and army from Gaza in 2005, while maintaining significant control over its borders.
Israel considers the West Bank–home to over 2 million Palestinians and 350,000 Jews–to be “disputed territory.” The 1995 Oslo II Accords gave the Israeli military temporary authority over most of the area, granting limited autonomy to the Palestinian Authority in Palestinian population centers.
Past Israeli governments have shown willingness to negotiate based on these lines, recognizing that Jews are becoming a minority in the territory under Israeli control, which jeopardizes the state’s democracy and Jewish character. However, the current coalition led by Prime Minister Netanyahu rejects the Green Line as “indefensible,” stressing the need for a long-term military presence in the West Bank, and permanent control over Israeli settlements and East Jerusalem. The Prime Minister has stated on occasion that there will never be a Palestinian state, and many of his government’s ministers are fierce opponents of the two-state solution. This position has put the government at odds with the vast majority of the international community.
Most Israeli settlements act as enclaves of Israeli sovereignty within the West Bank: their Jewish residents are Israeli citizens and can vote, receive public funding and benefits, and enjoy all other rights afforded to Israelis living within Israel proper.
However, their Palestinian neighbors do not live under democracy–rather, they are subject to Israeli military law. Palestinians in the West Bank are not permitted to vote in Israeli elections or obtain Israeli citizenship, though they may be tried and sentenced by Israeli military courts. The Israeli military restricts freedom of expression and demonstration for Palestinians, and limits freedom of movement, with mandatory security checkpoints and restricted access to land and roads under military control.
These limits, as well as Israeli control over tax collection, and access to electricity, water and other utilities, severely impede Palestinian life and development.
Most Israelis cross the Green Line in the West Bank or East Jerusalem without ever realizing that they have left Israel–and entered occupied territory on which Palestinians hope to build a state of their own.
Since 1967, the Israeli government has politically and economically encouraged Jewish settlement over the Green Line, an act that is considered illegal, according to Article 49 of the Geneva Convention. What began with a few security outposts scattered across the Jordan Valley slowly grew into today’s settler population of 400,000–most living in cities with tens of thousands of residents.
Following the rise of Netanyahu’s Likud party in 1977, Housing Minister David Levy removed the Green Line from official Israel maps. The Knesset rejected an effort in 2007 by then-Education Minister Yuli Tamir to return the Line to Israeli textbooks, and today, the State Department reports that over three-quarters of Israeli maps lack any distinction between Israeli and Palestinian territory.
While J Street, the Reform Movement and others are leading an effort to put the Green Line on American Jewish maps, the vast majority of maps used by Jewish institutions–including synagogues, Hebrew schools and Jewish federations– have no Green Line or distinction between Israel and occupied territory. This is just one example of the ways in which the Green Line is being erased from the Jewish communal consciousness–contributing to the denial of legitimate Palestinian claims to the land and undermining the prospects for a two-state resolution.
This has serious consequences for how the Jewish community operates. Without transparency or accountability, millions of dollars of funding to Jewish federations, charities and especially the World Zionist Organization, are supporting settlements and other projects over the Green Line.
These policies are damaging the viability of a future Palestinian state and the prospects for two states. And yet already under threat, Israel’s democracy cannot survive long without a two-state solution. With an international consensus growing, Israelis and American Jews have a greater responsibility than ever to remember the Green Line.